The new New Left and an old story.
OWS and Madison are not flashes in the pan. OWS and the nationwide movement it spawned are the second wave of the radicalization. The first was Madison when the growing left wing of unions flexed its wings and emerged much larger and more independent of the old trade union leadership and the Democrat party. Both arose as part of the massive radicalization underway generated by the Clinton-Bush-Obama Depression.
They're sure signs that independent mass action by the left is going to become a permanent feature of American politics for years to come.
Whatever the question - Obama's continuing oil wars, his murderous attack on Afghani civilians and his policies that murder of GIs; permanent, double digit unemployment;, immigrant bashing; homophobia; the coddling of the bankers and looters by both parties; huge leaps in foreclosures and homelessness; leaping rates of poverty; the escalating degradation of the environment by Democrats and Republicans; attacks on the Bill of Rights; rampant racism and misogyny and the spread and deepening of the Depression - there are now growing groups of militants willing to fight in no holds barred, 'won't take no for an answer' struggles for fundamental change.
These new layers of radical unionists and young OWS militants have a combative attitude, a clear understanding that the enemy is the ruling class - the looters and banksters. They also have plenty of the same stubbornness and courage that characterized the Continental Army of 1776, the Union Army of 1865, the suffragists, the young men and women who built the CIO and the civil rights and antiwar youth of the 1960s and 70s.
But what both lack is a coherent program of demands that will lead themselves and millions more to an eventual showdown struggle with the banksters and their lapdogs in the Democrat and Republican parties, the White House, Congress and the courts. OWS also lacks an open, independent leadership that emphasizes dismissing and abandoning Democrats and Republicans as the problem, not the solution. The occupations movements leadership is multifactional and lacks a tradition of solving differences by discussion, votes and rule of the majority. It's leadership is both diverse and deeply divided. It's headed towards splitsville. And of course the trade unions still have a dependent relationship with the Democrats that resembles in all ways spousal abuse. The new forces aroused at Madison and in the Occupations will have their work cut out for them trying to create independent (of the Democrats) mass movements for real change.
As in previous radicalizations in the 1930s and 1960s these newly radicalized layers of younger militants, in unions and in the occupation movement will mature, adopt a socialist program and forge a leadership dedicated to fundamental change.



